An internal photo shows the lasers of the Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus (ALPHA) antimatter experiment at work.
A bubbling, raucous vacuum fills quantum space, distorting the shape of every hydrogen atom in the universe. And now we know that it also distorts hydrogen’s bizarro-world antimatter twin: antihydrogen.
Antimatter is a little-understood substance, rare in our universe, that mimics matter almost perfectly, but with all the properties flipped around. For instance, electrons are tiny matter particles that carry negative charge. Their antimatter twins are tiny “positrons” that carry a positive charge. Combine an electron and a proton (a bigger, positively charged matter particle), and you get a simple hydrogen atom. Combine an antimatter positron with an “antiproton” and you get antihydrogen. When regular matter and antimatter touch, the matter and antimatter particles annihilate each other.
Currently, antimatter appears to be the perfect, antagonistic twin of matter, and one of the great mysteries of physics is why matter came to dominate space as antimatter became a bit player in the universe. Finding some difference between the two could help explain the structure of the modern universe.
The Lamb shift was a good place to look for that sort of difference, said Makoto Fujiwara, a Canadian particle physicist affiliated with CERN and co-author of the new study, published Feb. 19 in the journal Nature. Quantum physicists have known about this strange quantum effect, named after University of Arizona physicist Willis Lamb, since 1947. At the first major postwar conference of American physicists, Lamb revealed that something unseen inside hydrogen atoms pushes on their internal particles, creating a greater gap between the proton and orbiting electron than existing nuclear theory allowed.
“Roughly speaking, the Lamb shift is a physical manifestation of the effect of the ‘vacuum,'” Fujiwara told Live Science. “When you normally think about the vacuum, you think of ‘nothing.’ However, according to the theory of quantum physics, the vacuum is filled with the so-called ‘virtual particles,’ which are constantly being born and destroyed.”
That uncanny bubbling of brief, half-real particles has real impacts on the surrounding universe. And inside hydrogen atoms it creates a pressure that separates the two linked particles. The unexpected discovery won Lamb the 1955 Nobel Prize in physics.
But while physicists have known for decades that the Lamb shift altered hydrogen, they had no idea whether it also affected antihydrogen.
Fujiwara and his coauthors wanted to find out.
“The overall goal of our studies is to see if there is any difference between hydrogen and antihydrogen, and we do not know in advance where such a difference may show up,” Fujiwara told Live Science.
To study the question, the researchers painstakingly collected samples of antihydrogen using the Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus (ALPHA) antimatter experiment at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the continent’s giant nuclear physics laboratory. ALPHA takes a few hours to generate an antihydrogen sample large enough to work with, Fujiwara said.
It suspends the substance in magnetic fields that repel matter. ALPHA researchers then hit the trapped antihydrogen with laser light to study how the antimatter interacts with the photons, which can reveal hidden properties of the little anti-atoms.
Repeating their experiment a dozen times on different antihydrogen samples under different conditions, the ALPHA researchers found no difference between the Lamb shift in hydrogen and the Lamb shift in antihydrogen that their instruments could detect.
“Currently, there is no known difference between the fundamental properties of antihydrogen and regular hydrogen,” Fujiwara said. “If we find any difference, even the tiniest amount, it would force a radical change in the way we understand our physical universe.”
Though the researchers haven’t found any differences yet, antihydrogen physics is still a young field. Physicists didn’t even have any easily studied samples of the stuff until 2002, and ALPHA didn’t start routinely trapping hydrogen samples until 2011.
This discovery is a “first step,” Fujiwara said, but there’s still a lot more left to study before physicists will really understand how hydrogen and antihydrogen compare.
Sourse: www.livescience.com
