“`html
Optimus, a multi-functional robotic automaton, is being crafted by Tesla.(Image credit: Raman Shaunia/Shutterstock)ShareShare by:
- Copy link
- X
Share this article 0Join the conversationFollow usAdd us as a preferred source on GoogleNewsletterSubscribe to our newsletter
When Elon Musk deliberates over robotics, he seldom conceals the aspiration driving the vision.
Tesla’s Optimus is presented as a versatile humanoid robot capable of undertaking demanding tasks in manufacturing environments, liberating us from tedious jobs at home. Tesla intends to deploy a million of these robots within the upcoming decade.
You may like
-
Watch: New humanoid robot from a Chinese firm has such seamless motion, they revealed its inner workings to demonstrate no human was inside
-
Some individuals embrace AI, others detest it. Here is the rationale.
-
‘It won’t so much resemble a ghost town as a zombie apocalypse’: How AI might drastically alter the way we interact with the internet
Regardless of whether your initial interaction involved ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot, many of us experienced a comparable surge of astonishment. Here was a bot that appeared to grasp us in a manner that exceeded expectations. This has rendered Musk’s aspiration of a robotic partner, if not imminent, then undoubtedly nearer.
Envision perusing a catalogue of robots similarly to browsing for household gadgets. Should a personal robot still be deemed too costly, it may be viable to employ one on a part-time basis. Possibly a dance instructor doubling as a therapist. Families could collaborate to procure a robot for an aged relative. Certain individuals might even purchase one for themselves.
The envisioned future from Musk isn’t solely mechanical; it encompasses emotions.
Why the humanoid figure is significant
The notion of robots resembling us can evoke sensations of unease and intimidation. However, there exists a viable rationale for the ambition to construct robots with human-like characteristics.
A dishwasher functions as a robot of sorts, albeit requiring manual loading. A humanoid robot equipped with hands and fingers could clear the dining surface, load the dishwasher, and subsequently attend to pet care as well. In essence, engineers fashion humanoid robots because the environment is tailored to accommodate human forms.
Nevertheless, the humanoid configuration also carries an emotive impact. A machine featuring a face and extremities suggests attributes beyond mere utility. It embodies an assurance of intellect, compassion, or companionship. Optimus capitalizes on that enduring cultural perception. It represents a synthesis of pragmatic engineering, dramatic presentation, and an invitation to embrace the conviction that we are nearing the development of machines capable of coexisting harmoniously with humanity.
Situations arise when a personal robot could offer genuine solace. Anyone who has suffered illness, or provided care for someone who has, can comprehend the appeal of a caregiver that upholds dignity and autonomy. Robots, in contrast to people, are devoid of inherent judgmental tendencies. However, excessive delegation of our social interactions to machines poses a potential hazard.
You may like
-
Watch: Chinese company’s new humanoid robot moves so smoothly, they had to cut it open to prove a person wasn’t hiding inside
-
Some people love AI, others hate it. Here’s why.
-
‘It won’t be so much a ghost town as a zombie apocalypse’: How AI might forever change how we use the internet
If a robot is always present to rectify disarray, whether tangible or intangible, we risk forfeiting a fraction of the forbearance and empathy fostered through interpersonal coexistence.
Would a popcorn-fetching robot appeal to you?
That brings us to the critical consideration of design. In the most pessimistic depiction of life populated by generative AI-driven, conversational, adroit robots, we retreat into our domiciles, confined within our residences, tended by machines that consistently exhibit “comprehension” and discreet devotion. Comfort is optimized, though at the cost of something.
Granting the significance of sociability — the worth of enduring a modicum of added inconvenience to engage in interactions as humans among humans rather than exclusively with chatbots — the challenge takes on a pragmatic aspect. How can we forge a trajectory that orients us toward connection, as opposed to insidiously causing separation?
One avenue entails reassessing the locus of interaction. Instead of incorporating ubiquitous, invariably loquacious assistants into every facet of our existence, we might disseminate AI across various devices while circumscribing the topics they address. For instance, a washing machine could address laundering matters, while a navigation apparatus could deliberate routes. Yet expansive dialogue, the kind that molds identities, values, and affiliations, remains exclusive to exchanges between individuals.
On a larger scale, this type of deliberate design could reshape workspaces and shared areas, restoring them to settings conducive to human exchange. Evidently, this is viable only if individuals are encouraged to present themselves personally and to refrain from cell phone usage.
The core design concern lies not in enhancing machine attentiveness toward us, but in improving their capacity to guide us back into interpersonal interaction.
Consequently, contemplating the type of domestic framework we are progressively establishing carries weight. Will the robots welcomed into our abodes facilitate connectivity, or simply provide companionship?
Good bots, bad botsRELATED STORIES
—Eerie robotic hand disengages at the wrist, then scurries off to grab objects
—Emerging ‘Transformer’ humanoid robot can launch a shapeshifting drone off its back — watch it in action
—Strange robotic chair concept appears crab-like and has the ability to transport you around the home — it can even ease you into your car
A helpful bot could assist a socially hesitant child in getting to school. It may inspire an isolated teenager to participate in nearby activities. Or it might convey to a grouchy senior: “A crime fiction group convenes at the library in one hour. We can acquire a newspaper on the way.”
A detrimental bot leaves us entrenched: increasingly at ease with a machine while growing less comfortable interacting with each other.
Musk’s futuristic vision of humanoids could eventually materialize. The pivotal consideration is whether instruments like Optimus will catalyze the establishment of resilient communities, or subtly corrode the human connections most vital to us.
This revised content originates from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Access the initial article.
TOPICSElon Musk
Berry BillingsleyDirector of AI, Digital and Online Development, Swansea University
Professor Berry Billingsley serves as the Director of AI, Digital and Online Development at Swansea University, as well as the Principal Investigator for the Epistemic Insight and Future of Knowledge Initiative. Berry initiated her professional path in science broadcasting at the BBC—on programs such as Tomorrow’s World and Search Out Science. In her scholarly endeavors, Berry encourages learners across all age demographics to question and investigate profound philosophical inquiries such as “What constitutes humanity in the age of AI?”.
Show More Comments
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
LogoutRead more
Watch: Chinese company’s new humanoid robot moves so smoothly, they had to cut it open to prove a person wasn’t hiding inside
Some people love AI, others hate it. Here’s why.
‘It won’t be so much a ghost town as a zombie apocalypse’: How AI might forever change how we use the internet
‘Artificial intelligence’ myths have existed for centuries – from the ancient Greeks to a pope’s chatbot
When an AI algorithm is labeled ‘female,’ people are more likely to exploit it