“`html
Various instruments are being advertised online asserting the capability to monitor glucose levels without necessitating a finger prick.(Image credit: sutiporn somnam via Getty Images)ShareShare by:
- Copy link
- X
Share this articleJoin the conversationFollow usAdd us as a preferred source on GoogleNewsletterSubscribe to our newsletter
“Smartwatches” and “smart rings” are being promoted as having the aptitude to gauge glucose levels without needing a finger stick, but these instruments are not sanctioned by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are inadvisable for use, federal authorities have cautioned.
Individuals affected by diabetes must keenly keep tabs on how their blood glucose amounts vary in response to drugs, nourishment, and physical activity. Imprecise readings could cause individuals to utilize the incorrect amount of insulin or other glucose-lowering medications, potentially initiating perilous repercussions, such as convulsions and unconsciousness.
Certain apps on smartwatches communicate glucose levels, but these apps are paired with FDA-approved gadgets that do enter the person’s skin, for instance, continuous glucose monitors. Consumers should exercise caution when encountering smartwatches marketed to independently supervise glucose levels, the FDA advised in a statement issued Feb. 21.
You may like
-
New drug could prevent diabetes complications not fixed with blood sugar control, study hints
-
Scientists invent ‘Pulse-Fi’ prototype — a Wi-Fi heart rate monitor that’s cheaper to set up than the best wearable devices
-
Best smart rings 2025: Our top 3 sleep and fitness tracker rings, tried and tested
“The FDA has not given consent to, approved, or authorized any smartwatch or smart ring envisioned to calculate or approximate glucose readings on its own,” the announcement indicates. “Be informed that the well-being and operational capability of these instruments have not been examined by the FDA, and employing these instruments might yield imprecise assessments of glucose levels.”
The FDA’s cautionary advice pertains to any smartwatch or smart ring affirming to quantify blood sugar without skin penetration. The agency’s forewarning did not enumerate specific items but alluded that such instruments are fabricated by numerous firms and traded under assorted brand names. They’re frequently marketed through digital marketplaces or directly from their manufacturers, the agency pointed out.
The FDA is presently endeavoring to guarantee that producers, suppliers, and vendors do not unlawfully promote these instruments. In the meantime, the agency urges patients to converse with their healthcare experts regarding approved glucose monitors.
“If your health management hinges on precise glucose values, confer with your healthcare provider regarding an FDA-permitted instrument that addresses your requirements,” officials conveyed in the declaration.
RELATED STORIES
—Drug could reduce need for insulin in type 1 diabetes, early trial hints
—Diabetes vaccine shows promise for some patients in early trial
—1st ever drug to delay type 1 diabetes approved by FDA
Any individual who encounters a problem with faulty glucose calculation or who experiences any undesirable effects from utilizing an unsanctioned smartwatch or smart ring can document the predicament via the FDA’s MedWatch Voluntary Reporting Form.
This composition is solely for informational objectives and is not intended to deliver medical advice.
Do you ever find yourself wondering why certain individuals develop muscle mass more effortlessly than others or the reasons freckles emerge under sunlight? Direct your inquiries concerning the functionalities of the human body to [email protected] with the subject line “Health Desk Q,” and there’s a possibility your query may be addressed on the website!
Nicoletta LaneseSocial Links NavigationChannel Editor, Health
Nicoletta Lanese holds the role of health channel editor at Live Science and previously functioned as a news editor and staff writer at the platform. She is a graduate from UC Santa Cruz with a certification in science communication and possesses degrees in both neuroscience and dance from the University of Florida. Her creations have been featured in publications such as The Scientist, Science News, the Mercury News, Mongabay, and Stanford Medicine Magazine, amongst various others. Situated in NYC, she maintains a strong connection with dance, engaging in performances within the projects of local choreographers.
Read more
New drug could prevent diabetes complications not fixed with blood sugar control, study hints
Scientists invent ‘Pulse-Fi’ prototype — a Wi-Fi heart rate monitor that’s cheaper to set up than the best wearable devices
Best smart rings 2025: Our top 3 sleep and fitness tracker rings, tried and tested
Study links GLP-1 use to some pregnancy risks — but the research has key caveats
Could simple blood tests identify cancer earlier?
How to choose the best smartwatch for your loved one, according to an expert: The ultimate Christmas gift guide
Latest in Diabetes
Slaying ‘zombie cells’ in blood vessels could be key to treating diabetes, early study finds
What is type 5 diabetes? Newly recognized form of the disease gets name
Diabetic man produces his own insulin after gene-edited cell transplant
We may finally understand how metformin lowers blood sugar, animal study finds
In a 1st, scientists reversed type 1 diabetes by reprogramming a person’s own fat cells